Wishing you all a very Happy, Healthy & Prosperous 2016!

P3r.in  is a pioneering concept in its own domain. Although it has a worldwide application, in some geographical regions E-Learning is yet to commence as a common learning Environment. One may have doubts in its effectiveness in terms of impact, evidence of learning, retention of content and learning outcomes.

We believe that the research papers presented here will clear majority of such doubts.

  • A research paper by William West et al will demonstrate how E-Learning directly improves teaching/self learning research writing.
  • Amita Maxwell at JSBS, SHIATS, Naini , India in her paper elaborates on the increasing impact of information and communication technologies (ICT) and the associated rise in E learning which is now recognized world over for transforming training and learning in the Indian scenario.
  • In their research paper named “e-Learning Indicators: a Multi-Dimensional Model for planning and evaluating e-Learning Software Solutions”, researchers Bekim Fetaji and Majlinda Fetaji of South east Europe university have given a systematic or a standardized way of planning, comparing and evaluating e-learning projects, their outcomes, and their effectiveness.

An obvious question which comes to the minds of decision makers like deans, or PhD guides is-What and where is the evidence of such an E-Learning?

Guidelines for Environmental Research by Ministry of forests , environment and climate change-Government of India

IPCC Ph.D. Scholarships on climate change topics from developing countries

We sincerely hope all this content will add and contribute to the knowledge of our esteemed researcher learners and decision makers.  

  • Fetaji B, and Fetaji M. “e-Learning Indicators: a Multi-Dimensional Model for Planning and Evaluating e-Learning Software Solutions.” Electronic Journal of e-Learning Volume 7 Issue 2 2009, (pp1 – 28), available online at www.ejel.org
  • Arunkumar Agaria and Deepali Singh. “E-Learning quality: Scale development and validation in Indian context” Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol.4, No.4. p.500 3.
  • William west, B.R. Simon rosser, Salma Monani & Laura Gurak. “ How Learning Styles Impact E-learning: a case comparative study of undergraduate students who excelled, passed, or failed an online course in scientific/technical writing” E–Learning, Volume 3, Number 4, 2006 doi: 10.2304/elea.2006.3.4.534 534
  •  Price & Kirkwood (2010). Technology enhanced learning –“ where’s the evidence? In C.H. Steel, M.J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp.772-782). http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/procs/Price-concise.pdf
  •  Amita Maxwell. “Technological advancements in methods of training with reference to online training: impact and issues for organizations” Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce Vol.– III, Issue –3,July. 2012 [87]
  • Ashraf Uddin and Vivek Kumar Singh, “Measuring research output and collaboration in South Asian countries” ,CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 107, NO. 1, 10 JULY 2014.